EDUC 632, Summer 2001
Robert Cerf
Reflection on Uses of the Internet in the Classroom
 

    I have been an ELA teacher for five years as of this writing. Coming into this field late in life, most of my colleagues with five years of teaching experience are, at best, in their late twenties. As such, most secondary ELA teachers -- and virtually all of my students -- are considerably more computer literate than I have been until now. For me, the Internet was always a giant cyber vacuum to become lost in as I futilely searched for lesson plans or sports scores. Now, thanks to this class, I am on my way to using the Internet as an integral part of teaching, communicating, and negotiating the overall business of twenty-first century education. After completing the course readings, assignments, and working on my Web project, I believe I understand how to best use the Internet in my high school English classroom. Mainly, this involves utilizing student interest and skills to maximize learning, exposing and guiding students to teacher directed information, communicating with students, parents, and fellow teachers, and providing students with a necessary model for "doing business" once they leave high school.
    First of all, kids today know so much more about computers and technology than do most adults. Since student minds are already open to the familiarity of computers, why not capitalize on this by creating as many educational tie-ins as possible? I already know how effective computer based learning can be from my experiences last year with the Accelerated Reader program. Almost every one of my students increased his or her reading level and comprehension by the end of each semester. For some, it also raised the "fun factor" of learning as well.
    Having fun while learning is very important to me as a teacher. So, I now realize that technology is an instructional tool much like a chalkboard or a book. This medium, however, is perceived as "friendly" and "fun" by most kids and therefore minimizes resistance to learning. It is only logical that, starting with the upcoming year, I extend my "meager" technological applications to date one step further by putting the Internet to use in my classroom. With respect to the Loti framework, I started this class at a level 2 (exploration), feel competent now that I am approaching a level 3 (infusion), but hope to achieve the competency of level 4B (routine integration of technology) shortly. In short, I owe it to my kids to bring myself up to their technological level so that overall instructional effectiveness increases in my classroom.
    It is easy to see where and how the Internet will increase this instructional effectiveness in my classroom since my curriculum involves writing fundamentals, reading comprehension, accessing and applying information, understanding the differences between various types of writing, working individually and in a group, and presenting evaluated information to myself and the class via written and oral mediums. These tasks, which until now have been completed by my students largely without the use of the Internet, can only become more student accessible and be better learning experiences by incorporating the Web into my curriculum. Plus, my vision of how this technology tool will be used in my classroom fits in quite naturally with Delaware's ELA Standards!
    Secondly, I believe that the Internet can help me to focus my students on accessing almost unlimited amounts of information. This, of course, is a double edged sword: the resources are plentiful but the accuracy can be questionable. Turning kids loose on the Web to "find some expository writing examples" would be as much of a classroom management faux pas as carting them all to the library and telling the students to "go and find examples of expository writing." The Internet, like use of any learning tool, must be kept in perspective by the teacher and supplemented by "nuts and bolts" lessons prior to student access. It's just like the VCR: you can use it to highlight and emphasize specific learning goals or use it merely as a baby-sitter. To this end the Internet is no different than any other instructional resource.
    In keeping with this, students must be both supervised in their overall use of the Internet (high schoolers love to "abuse" resources by going outside the lesson's scope) as well as guided in developing their own evaluatory skills. With respect to the first item, this is simply sound classroom management. As far as student evaluation of Internet materials goes, two "filters" need to be "installed" into students' minds: having specific teacher created tasks and preselected URLs means that they cannot be turned loose on the Web for unsupervised browsing, and students need a "template" or resource for the important process of evaluating information. I have created an evaluation form based on the examples found in The Good, the Bad and the Ugly or Why It’s a Good Idea to Evaluate Web Sources. Students will print this form out by accessing my Web page (discussed below). To this end I can hopefully "frame" the Internet use in my classroom.
    In addition to managing and focusing the virtually unlimited Internet information and its learning potential, a very practical -- and personal -- outgrowth of this class for me will be to use the Internet for communicating with students, parents, and other educators both locally as well as globally. This September I will create a discussion area on my Web site for posting assignments and publishing a weekly
"newsletter." Both parents and students alike will be able to access this site and it should help to
streamline and deepen the communication process. So, when open house rolls around this year, I'll be
writing my Web address on the board and asking all parents to provide me with their e-mail address.
Through my Web page and list servs I can also communicate with other teachers everywhere and
incorporate other resources and suggestions into my teaching. Likewise, my students will also be able to
communicate with other students and teachers everywhere to broaden their own experiences and
knowledge bases.
    Finally, and perhaps most importantly, integrating the Internet into my classroom via the
aforementioned ways will help prepare students for life after high school. This goal is easily as important
-- if not more so -- as subject mastery is for me. Before using the Internet, I always maintained that
behavior was equally as important to me as ELA subject matter. In other words, manners and conduct
count! Why? Because high school is an opportunity to provide students with the necessary academic and
social skills needed to survive and succeed in the real world. Computers are not an "end" in and of
themselves. As discussed in class, practicing with them and the Internet helps to fill in "gaps" in student
schemata. This is no different than coaching kids to raise their hands when asking a question instead of
shouting it out rudely. Just like instruction in the pre computer era, students learn about the world by
breaking higher order thinking tasks into more manageable steps and eventually expanding outward and
upward. Computer and Internet use helps to continue this process by balancing between solving a
particular problem and then building up an overall conceptual framework. In other words, "learning."
Since my students' future employers will ask them to do this with technology, it would be an injustice for
me not to prepare these kids while still in school. Perhaps the Harris article we read in class for telecollaboration sums it up the best:  "(p)roblem solving is one of the best learning opportunities we can offer students of any age. The Internet can be used to support problem based learning around the world through information searches, peer feedback activities, parallel problem solving, sequential creations, telepresent problem solving, simulations, and social action projects" (Harris 7). These ideas are right on target for me.
    In conclusion, managing any new technology is a balancing act. There is nothing magical about the Internet. It is up to me to regulate the classroom environment and to allocate computer use fairly and equitably. Since I won't have a machine for every student, Internet projects will grow out of group work. Students will work on other aspects of particular tasks while their peers use the computer. This will free me up to circulate around the classroom, answer questions, and to help those students who are struggling one-on-one. As with any class, some students will be less advanced than others. Even in today's world some students still have little or no computer experience. Just like any other learning deficit, it will be up to me to bring these children up to speed. Remember, technology is a tool; if a teacher abuses it or overuses it in the face of neglecting other important instructional protocols, then he or she becomes the tool!
 
 

SOURCES


Beck, Susan. The Good, the Bad and the Ugly or Why It's a Good Idea to Evaluate Web
        Sources (1997).
        Accessed July 17, 2001 at
        http://lib.nmsu.edu/instruction/eval.html

Delaware Department of Education. ELA Standards (1995).
        Accessed July 17, 2001 at
        http://www.doe.state.de.us/englangarts/elastandards.htm

Harris, Judi. Curriculum-Based Telecollaboration. Using Activity Structures to Design
        Student Projects (1998).
        Accessed July 17, 2001 at
        http://www.udel.edu/sine/course/syllabus01/readings/telecollaboration.pdf

Learning Quest. LoTi Framework. Assessing Teacher's Use of Technology (1999).
        Accessed July 17, 2001 at
        http://www.udel.edu/sine/course/syllabus01/readings/loti_handouts.pdf (loti)